Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 27(11): 4133-4140, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32767223

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for melanoma patients has been questioned. We aimed to study high-risk stage II melanoma patients who underwent SNB to determine what the prognostic factors regarding recurrence and mortality were, and evaluate how relevant SNB status is in this scenario. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of clinical stage IIB/IIC melanoma patients who underwent SNB from 2000 to 2015 in a single institution. Prognostic factors related to distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were assessed from multiple Cox regression. Relevant variables were used to create risk predictor nomograms for DRFS and MSS. RESULTS: From 1213 SNB, 259 were performed for clinical stage IIB/IIC melanoma patients. SNB status was the most important variable for both endpoints. Patients with positive SNB presented median DRFS of 35.73 months (95% CI 21.38-50.08, SE 7.32) and median MSS of 66.4 months (95% CI 29.76-103.03, SE 18.69), meanwhile both median DRFS and MSS were not achieved for those with negative SNB (logrank < 0.0001). Both nomograms have been internally validated and presented adequate calibration (C-index was 0.734 for DRFS and 0.718 for MSS). CONCLUSIONS: SNB status was the most important risk factor in our cohort of clinical stage IIB and IIC patients and, in conjunction with well-established primary tumor characteristics, should not be abandoned. Their use in prognosis for these patients remains extremely useful for daily practice.


Assuntos
Melanoma , Linfonodo Sentinela , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Melanoma/cirurgia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Linfonodo Sentinela/cirurgia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia
2.
J Surg Oncol ; 121(5): 718-729, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31777095

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The primary treatment for locally advanced cases of cervical cancer is chemoradiation followed by high-dose brachytherapy. When this treatment fails, pelvic exenteration (PE) is an option in some cases. This study aimed to develop recommendations for the best management of patients with cervical cancer undergoing salvage PE. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to all members of the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology. Of them, 68 surgeons participated in the study and were divided into 10 working groups. A literature review of studies retrieved from the National Library of Medicine database was carried out on topics chosen by the participants. These topics were indications for curative and palliative PE, preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of tumor resectability, access routes and surgical techniques, PE classification, urinary, vaginal, intestinal, and pelvic floor reconstructions, and postoperative follow-up. To define the level of evidence and strength of each recommendation, an adapted version of the Infectious Diseases Society of America Health Service rating system was used. RESULTS: Most conducts and management strategies reviewed were strongly recommended by the participants. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines outlining strategies for PE in the treatment of persistent or relapsed cervical cancer were developed and are based on the best evidence available in the literature.


Assuntos
Exenteração Pélvica/normas , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Brasil , Colostomia/métodos , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Drenagem , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Avaliação Nutricional , Estomia , Cuidados Paliativos , Diafragma da Pelve/cirurgia , Lavagem Peritoneal , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Sociedades Médicas , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Cateteres Urinários , Coletores de Urina , Vagina/cirurgia , Gravação em Vídeo
3.
J Surg Oncol ; 117(5): 864-867, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29484669

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Minor basin or in transit node drainage can be found in patients with cutaneous melanoma who undergo sentinel node biopsy. Its clinical impact is still unclear. Our objective is to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients who presented with in transit sentinel node (ITN) drainage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in a single Brazilian institution between 2000 and 2015. RESULTS: Our cohort comprised 1223 SNB. There were 64 patients (5.2%) with ITN. Melanoma of the limbs (OR 10.61, P < 0.0001) and acral subtype (OR 3.49, P < 0.0001) were associated with ITN drainage. Among these 64 patients, 14 (21.9%) had a positive SNB. The ITN was positive for metastases in five patients, four in a popliteal basin and one on the trunk. Regarding completion node dissection (CND), two patients had positive non-sentinel nodes (NSN), both in major basins. In patients who developed recurrence, time to recurrence was shorter (mean time 18 vs 31.4 months, P = 0.001) and time to death was shorter (mean time 31.6 vs 40 months, P = 0.039) in those who had ITN drainage. CONCLUSION: ITN drainage was associated with earlier recurrences and deaths from melanoma.


Assuntos
Drenagem , Melanoma/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Linfonodo Sentinela/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Linfonodo Sentinela/cirurgia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Melanoma Maligno Cutâneo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...